🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."